Refine
Clear All
Your Track:
Live:
Search in:
Beyond The Horizon
Beyond The Horizon

Beyond The Horizon

Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at the same time attempting to side step the gaslighting and rhetoric in search of the truth. From the day to day news that dominates the headlines to more complex geopolitical issues that effect all of our lives, we will be exploring them all. <br /><br />It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.

Available Episodes 10

Chelsea Grimm was last seen in Arizona after speaking with Police officers while at a memorial for fallen soldiers. She stated that she was there to take pictures of the memorial, but that she got emotional. After a conversation with the police, who told her about a truck stop she could get some rest at, Chelsea was last entering Kaibab national forest.

A man working in the area saw her and asked her if she required assistance and she said she was okay. The man, asked a second time and was told the same thing. That was the last time anyone saw or spoke with Chelsea Grim.


Chelsea was on a cross country road trip from San Diego to Connecticut for a wedding and she planned on working on a project about "The forgotten people" of America.


Her family has hired a private investigator and continue to seek answers.

(commercial at 6:49)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

California photographer Chelsea Grimm who vanished in Arizona on cross-country road trip to document 'the lost and forgotten people of this country' is seen on police bodycam footage days before she went missing | Daily Mail Online

The recent kidnapping of four Americans and the death of two of them has once again renewed the calls from the war hawks in congress and the senate who are now calling for American military intervention in Mexico in order to combat the drugs and violence that comes with those drugs.


In this episode, we take a look at those calls for military intervention and discuss why it might not have the effect that the talking heads might hope for.


(commercial at 8:11)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

Republican Says U.S. Troops Should Enter Mexico—'Have a Military Presence' (newsweek.com)


In November 2023, singer Cassie Ventura filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging a pattern of abuse during their relationship from 2007 to 2018. The lawsuit detailed instances of physical violence, including punching, kicking, and stomping, resulting in injuries such as bruises and black eyes. Ventura also accused Combs of introducing her to a lifestyle of excessive alcohol and substance abuse, coercing her into procuring illicit prescriptions to satisfy his addictions. Additionally, she claimed that Combs forced her into sexual acts with male sex workers while he filmed the encounters, and that he raped her in her own home after she attempted to leave him.

The lawsuit further alleged that Combs exerted complete control over Ventura's personal and professional life, ensuring her inability to escape his hold. It claimed that he was prone to uncontrollable rage and frequently reminded Ventura of his power and influence, making it clear that there was no way out of the relationship. The suit also mentioned an incident where Combs blew up a man's car after learning that he was romantically interested in Ventura. These allegations painted a picture of a relationship marked by manipulation, violence, and exploitation.



to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In a recent ruling, Judge Analisa Torres criticized Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, for his aggressive legal tactics in the ongoing lawsuit where Jay-Z is accused of sexual assault. Judge Torres described Spiro's repeated filings, which included inflammatory language and personal attacks, as inappropriate and a waste of judicial resources. She emphasized that such combative motions are unlikely to benefit his client and stated, "The Court will not fast-track the judicial process merely because counsel demands it."


Additionally, Judge Torres denied Spiro's motions to dismiss the lawsuit and to reveal the identity of the plaintiff, who is proceeding under the pseudonym "Jane Doe." She ruled that the plaintiff could remain anonymous at this stage of the litigation, citing the sensitive nature of the allegations and the potential harm to the plaintiff's mental health and safety. This decision underscores the court's commitment to ensuring a fair legal process while protecting the rights of individuals involved in such serious allegations.

(commercial at 10:06)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source;

Judge explodes at Jay-Z in child rape case and rules against rapper after 'relentless' courtroom plot | Daily Mail Online

In a recent ruling, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court granted the accuser in a high-profile lawsuit against Jay-Z the ability to remain anonymous. The accuser, identified only as "Jane Doe," had filed a lawsuit alleging sexual assault by the rapper and business mogul. Judge Torres acknowledged the significant public interest in the case but determined that the plaintiff's privacy and safety outweighed the need for public disclosure of her identity. The order emphasized the potential risks of harassment, intimidation, and stigma that could arise if her identity were revealed, particularly given Jay-Z's prominence and the heightened media scrutiny surrounding the case.


The ruling does not impact the progression of the legal proceedings, as the court will ensure both parties have access to necessary information for a fair trial. However, it sets an important precedent in balancing the rights of accusers in sensitive cases with public transparency. Judge Torres underscored that allowing Jane Doe to proceed anonymously would not prejudice Jay-Z's defense or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.



(commercial at 8:42)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.53.0.pdf

In November 2024, country music star Garth Brooks filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to dismiss a sexual assault and battery lawsuit brought against him by a former makeup artist, identified as Jane Roe. Brooks contended that Roe's claims should be dismissed or transferred to Mississippi, where a related lawsuit he initiated against her was already pending. He argued that the allegations were part of an extortion attempt and that the California court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.


In this episode, we take a look at that motion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.cacd.946930.12.0_1.pdf

In November 2024, country music star Garth Brooks filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to dismiss a sexual assault and battery lawsuit brought against him by a former makeup artist, identified as Jane Roe. Brooks contended that Roe's claims should be dismissed or transferred to Mississippi, where a related lawsuit he initiated against her was already pending. He argued that the allegations were part of an extortion attempt and that the California court lacked jurisdiction over the matter.


In this episode, we take a look at that motion.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


source:

gov.uscourts.cacd.946930.12.0_1.pdf

In the case 24-cv-07975-AT, Defendant Shawn Carter (also known as Jay-Z) has filed a motion opposing the plaintiff's request to proceed anonymously under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a), which generally requires parties to be named in public court proceedings. Carter argues that the plaintiff's anonymity could prejudice his ability to defend against the claims and that public interest and transparency in judicial proceedings favor disclosure of the plaintiff's identity. Alternatively, he seeks dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), asserting that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented.

Carter's motion emphasizes that anonymity in litigation is an extraordinary measure requiring strong justification, which he claims the plaintiff has failed to provide. Furthermore, he questions the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's claims and argues that the court should dismiss the case if it determines it lacks jurisdiction or if the plaintiff does not adequately establish the grounds for proceeding anonymously. The motion seeks to resolve these procedural and jurisdictional issues before addressing the substantive merits of the complaint.

(commercial at 7:53)

to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


soruce:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.38.0.pdf

In a lawsuit filed in a New York federal court, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse have accused the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) of enabling his sex trafficking operations. The plaintiffs allege that Epstein received special treatment and privileges within the USVI, which facilitated his criminal activities. This legal action follows a $75 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and the USVI over similar allegations concerning Epstein's activities. 


The survivors' complaint contends that the USVI's actions, or lack thereof, allowed Epstein's trafficking network to operate unchecked within the territory. This lawsuit is part of a broader effort by Epstein's victims to seek accountability from individuals and institutions that they believe played a role in enabling his abuse. Previously, the USVI reached a settlement of at least $105 million with Epstein's estate, highlighting the territory's ongoing legal challenges related to Epstein's crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In a lawsuit filed in a New York federal court, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse have accused the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) of enabling his sex trafficking operations. The plaintiffs allege that Epstein received special treatment and privileges within the USVI, which facilitated his criminal activities. This legal action follows a $75 million settlement between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and the USVI over similar allegations concerning Epstein's activities. 


The survivors' complaint contends that the USVI's actions, or lack thereof, allowed Epstein's trafficking network to operate unchecked within the territory. This lawsuit is part of a broader effort by Epstein's victims to seek accountability from individuals and institutions that they believe played a role in enabling his abuse. Previously, the USVI reached a settlement of at least $105 million with Epstein's estate, highlighting the territory's ongoing legal challenges related to Epstein's crimes.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com